In article
,
D.M. Procida wrote:


In a hotel lobby today, I was leafing through an hi-fi magazine I
happened to see. It reviewed a CD player, opening with a sentence to the
effect that "the CD player as we know it may soon be dead".

This CD player (a Meridian, and rather expensive) apparently uses a
cheap CD-ROM drive to get the data off the disk, and can use the drive's
extra speed to read ahead and buffer it (allowing it for example to have
multiple goes at reading problematic areas of the disk) in pretty much
the way I suggested would be possible.

I assume it's this one:
https://www.meridian-audio.com/en/products/cd-players/reference-808v6/.

So maybe I'm not missing anything... although I do note that this
solution to the problem of playing CDs doesn't actually make the
business cheaper.

They aren't the only people who do this. The problem is that it simply
alters the area of operation. e.g. by reading at a higher speed the
bandwidth has to go up = more noise, etc. Thus increasing the read speed
means you increase the chance of errors that then require a re-read to deal
with. Ditto, more mechanical wobbles at higher wobble rates needing faster
servos, etc, etc.

The kinds of things that using cdparanoia from a terminal window tends to
show the user.

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

In article ,
Don Pearce wrote:

Transfer to SSD has to be the answer to all these issues.

Once you've done the transfer. :-)

Alas, that then gives the metadata problems like not having the printed
leaflet handy, etc.

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

In article , "Dave Plowman (News)"
writes:

In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote:
However for some other types of recording, there will be no acoustic
'original' beyond what someone sitting at a mixing desk created as they
operated the controls to get a result they think will 'sell', or have
impact or please their target audience. Using a setup you would never get
to hear and which is unlike home hi-fi systems. In those cases you can't
access such a reference so just have to decide if you like the result or
not.

It's actually quite rare to have a totally electronic recording.
Most have vocals. Many real drums, guitars, and so on. All of which picked
up by microphones in exactly the same way as a classical piece.

And then it would be very rare to have an unprocessed acoustic
'original'. The recording session I did on Saturday involved my bass
going direct to the desk (no acoustic original) and, while the drums
were acoustic and recorded acoustically, I would suggest that it is
unlikley that any member of an audience would actually choose to
listen with their ear inside the bass drum, or next to either the top
or bottom skin of the snare, etc. You won't necessarily have electric
guitars miced up nowadays, and any instrument could be recorded dry
with the intention of putting effects on in the later production
stages. After all, if you have an effect in the instrument-amp or
instrument-desk chain, you're stuck with it, whereas if you record
dry, you can put on whatever you like (and that might well include amp
and cab sims). Hence, though I use chorus live on the bass (well, the
fretless and fretted 5s, if I ever use the 10-string live it won't be
with a chorus), I recorded it dry with the tone controls set flat.

--
Mike Fleming

In article , Graeme Wall
writes:

On 21/11/2017 09:47, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , Mike Fleming
wrote:

"People make an awful lot of fuss, anyway, about the quality of the
sound they listen to. Have you noticed; they spend all that time trying
to get the exact effect of an orchestra actually playing in their
sitting room. Personally, I can't think of anything I should hate more
than an orchestra actually playing in my sitting room."

Misses a point that some of us may want to hear the "sound of the orchestra
in the *concert hall* " in our listening room - or at least as close to
that as we can get. And if - like me - you enjoy going to classical
concerts you may wish to do this. Or at least get as close to it as you
can. Something I'd love, not hate. No-one is demanding you or anyone else
*has* to want the same, though.

Does nobody remember A Song of Reproduction?

Just the two of us, it would appear.

--
Mike Fleming

In article , Mike Fleming
wrote:
Does nobody remember A Song of Reproduction?

Just the two of us, it would appear.

Maybe that explains why more "flutter on your bottom" shows up these days.
:-)

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:33:21 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote:

In article ,
Don Pearce wrote:

Transfer to SSD has to be the answer to all these issues.

Once you've done the transfer. :-)

Alas, that then gives the metadata problems like not having the printed
leaflet handy, etc.

Jim

As long as you are online, all that metadata is available with no
effort. Anyway, there's nothing to stop you keeping the sleeve notes -
and the original disc .

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Jim Lesurf said:
In article ,
Don Pearce wrote:

Transfer to SSD has to be the answer to all these issues.

Once you've done the transfer. :-)

The good news is, you only need to do it once.

Alas, that then gives the metadata problems like not having the printed
leaflet handy, etc.

Strictly speaking, that's not 'audio' ? ;-)

It's a point - but then again physical media have a metadata problem, too :
"you can't grep dead trees". Tagging Is Good.


As a clarinet player with no background in sound engineering, my concerns
are maybe a little off-centre here, but it's a very interesting thread, even
if I can't keep up - especially since I've been playing with 'making a
recording'. So this 'concert-hall' digression is intriguing for me. From the
POV of an instrumentalist with no-one to tell me what I should be doing, I
reckon I know what my instrument sounds like (if I'm playing it as nicely as
I can), better than any third party could, and _that_'s what I want people
to hear. It's a very idealised version of "reality" - I'm rather shocked at
how many little glitches slip through in my live playing (it's "the ill wind
that nobody blows good", like most wind instruments).

If anybody wishes to read my "off-centre" above as "eccentric", that'd be up
to them ...

--
Richard Robinson
"The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem

My email address is at http://qualmograph.org.uk/contact.html

In article , Don Pearce
wrote:
Alas, that then gives the metadata problems like not having the printed
leaflet handy, etc.

Jim

As long as you are online, all that metadata is available with no
effort.

In general, I play files with a simple audio player without using a browser
or web. So you condition essentially returns 'false' for me.

I do now have a 'DAP', but of course when this will be used, it isn't
connected to the net or any wireless, etc. So again, would return 'false'
as above.

Anyway, there's nothing to stop you keeping the sleeve notes -
and the original disc .

Scanning it is the problem. Otherwise if you have to find the CD booklet,
so you may as well keep the CD with it and play that. :-)

In general I've not bothered to rip CDs. More useful from my POV to make
transfers from old LPs. The resulting file *is* more convenient to play -
particularly if I'm in the kitchen, say. And also lets me deal with
'clicks'.

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

In article , Richard
Robinson wrote:

If anybody wishes to read my "off-centre" above as "eccentric", that'd
be up to them ...

No worries. We're all barmy here. Entry requirement. 8-]

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

In article
,
D.M. Procida wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

In article
,
D.M. Procida wrote:
This CD player (a Meridian, and rather expensive) apparently uses a
cheap CD-ROM drive to get the data off the disk, and can use the
drive's extra speed to read ahead and buffer it (allowing it for
example to have multiple goes at reading problematic areas of the
disk) in pretty much the way I suggested would be possible.

I've got a CD 'jukebox' here. Either plays CDs direct, or rips them to
an internal hard drive. And trust me, you don't want a CD-Rom drive
spinning at speed in the same room as a CD you're listening to.

I know what a CD-ROM drive at full blast sounds like. However even the
cheapest ones now have quiet or silent modes; they don't all have to run
at top speed all the time.

Then the extra speed to read a dodgy CD rather pointless?

The Meridian solution seems to do as I imagined, needing neither to
operate fully in real-time or to require storage of the complete CD.

Is your CD jukebox a homegrown affair?

No - it's a relatively cheap Acoustic Solutions one I got given as faulty
ages ago and sorted. Works tolerably well for background use.

Daniele

--
*If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.