A Audio, hi-fi and car audio  forum. Audio Banter

Go Back   Home » Audio Banter forum » UK Audio Newsgroups » uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (uk.rec.audio) Discussion and exchange of hi-fi audio equipment.

Noobie recording fun and games!



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #171 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 04, 11:57 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Andy Evans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 759
Default Anyone Got a Cheap Valve Power Amp or Integrated Amp For Sale?

Oh Andy! I really thought that maybe you were a worthy opponent

Clearly you are one of those sad people who think life is a contest with
winners and losers.

=== Andy Evans ===
Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.
  #172 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 04, 11:59 AM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,412
Default Anyone Got a Cheap Valve Power Amp or Integrated Amp For Sale?

On 15 Jun 2004 10:57:21 GMT, ohawker (Andy
Evans) wrote:

Oh Andy! I really thought that maybe you were a worthy opponent

Clearly you are one of those sad people who think life is a contest with
winners and losers.

=== Andy Evans ===
Visit our Website:-
http://www.artsandmedia.com
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.


See - no answer to any of the points I made, so you snipped them, You
just added cowardice to your collection of qualities.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
  #173 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 04, 12:42 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Trevor Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 801
Default Anyone Got a Cheap Valve Power Amp or Integrated Amp For Sale?


"John Phillips" wrote in message
...
In article , Andy Evans

wrote:
Some discussion of voicing DIY tube amps:
snip


Interesting thread. I guess it illustrates how far away valve/tube
amplifiers still are from the ideal of just being "an amplifier."
Show me two amplifiers that (really do) sound different and I'll show
you *at least* one which is not behaving as ideally it should.


**Not necessarily. You could be listening to an amplifier which is connected
to a load, which is not quite what the manufacturer has specified that it
is.


Loudspeakers, imperfect mechanical transducers that they are, are like
that still. I suspect the same is true of vinyl and vinyl reproduction
kit (but I have no recent experience).


**A reasonable vinyl system, except for S/N, is very hard to pick from 16/44
digital. On a purely technical basis, a really good vinyl system can
outperform a 16/44 digital one, in a couple of areas.


However, my own view is that for some time the state of the art in other
audio components (including cables) is such that ideality is the right
and obvious goal to be approached. Naturally, if anyone still wants to
select or tweak an amplfier to tune the "voice" of his/her audio systems
then that's fine by me. After all the object is one of enjoying the
result (and/or the tweaking process).

Indeed, if valve/tube amplifiers did all sound the same then a few in the
audio industry would be out of a job since the amount of money coming
into that sector would drop significantly. So the preservation of a
"voicing" sector through the mutual interests of producers and consumers
seems inevitable.


**Ironically, REALLY good valve amps (ARC VT100, VT150, et al) sound so
similar to really good SS amps, that it is very difficult o pick them apart.
It is REALLY easy to pick a cheap, crappy valve amp from a good SS amp,
however. That should tell us something.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au



  #174 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 04, 01:02 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Andy Evans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 759
Default Anyone Got a Cheap Valve Power Amp or Integrated Amp For Sale?

It is REALLY easy to pick a cheap, crappy valve amp from a good SS amp,
however. That should tell us something.

And a cheap crappy SS amp from a good valve amp. Does this tell us something
else or the same thing?

=== Andy Evans ===
Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.
  #175 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 04, 01:45 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Dave Plowman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 735
Default Anyone Got a Cheap Valve Power Amp or Integrated Amp For Sale?

In article ,
Andy Evans wrote:
It is REALLY easy to pick a cheap, crappy valve amp from a good SS amp,
however. That should tell us something.


And a cheap crappy SS amp from a good valve amp. Does this tell us
something else or the same thing?


It would be near impossible - or certainly no point in it - in making an
SS amp that sounded quite as bad as those dreadful single ended low power
valve amps with output transformers barely any better than a mains one
that were so common on radios, TVs and record players.

That should tell you something.

--
*Santa's helpers are subordinate clauses.*

Dave Plowman London SW 12
RIP Acorn
  #176 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 04, 01:51 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,412
Default Anyone Got a Cheap Valve Power Amp or Integrated Amp For Sale?

On 15 Jun 2004 11:45:30 GMT, ohawker (Andy
Evans) wrote:

My apologies, letting my mind wander a bit here. Must be the heat.


If you say so.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
  #177 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 04, 01:54 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,412
Default Anyone Got a Cheap Valve Power Amp or Integrated Amp For Sale?

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:29:47 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote:

In article , Andy Evans
wrote:
Afraid I'm not a 'physicist' any more. I retired last month...


Happy retirement, Jim! Or is another career beckoning...........


More than one. ;-)

1) Gardening. (My wife is astonished!) I now have a hoe. ;-

2) Writing articles for magazines. (This does not surprise her at all. She
just sighed.) Second one sold to HFN recently. Writing another at present
but not sure where it will appear.

3) going in to my old R&D group and annoying them with awkward questions.
:-)

Slainte,

Jim


Jim, don't forget that the shed is at the end of the garden! You can
put all sorts of stuff in there much more interesting than the weeds.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
  #178 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 04, 01:57 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Don Pearce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,412
Default Anyone Got a Cheap Valve Power Amp or Integrated Amp For Sale?

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:46:37 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote:

In article , Trevor Wilson
wrote:

"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message
...



Still have a slipstick as well.. ;-


**Me too. I have the finest one ever made. The mighty Faber Castel
2/83N.


Mine is just a cheap Ricoh (Japanese) one. Bought it for 6th form and
university. The curious thing about it is that it is made from wood with a
plastic facing for the scales! Thus I can claim to have an analogue
computer[1] made of wood. :-)

[1] OK, its not programmable, so not really a 'computer'. However it never
gave me a blue screen... ;-

Slainte,

Jim


Of course it is programmable. You prgramme it by setting up the
sliders against each other in their proper dispositions, then you run
the programme by sliding the cursor along to the right point.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
  #179 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 04, 02:08 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Jim Lesurf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,051
Default Anyone Got a Cheap Valve Power Amp or Integrated Amp For Sale?

In article , Andy Evans
wrote:
Good morning, Jim, and indeed a fine sunny one.


Here also. :-) The weather people on TV/radio keep telling me that today
is cloudy and colder. I am beginning to suspect that none of them live
anywhere near us or bother to look out of the window! :-)

[snip]

However for the same reason I might personally tend to prefer a SS
design precisely because it might give less scope for component
variations having an audible effect.


This is interesting, because I'm sure many people like valve amps
because they CAN make audible changes by swapping componants. This gives
them an interactive role in their audio passion, which they appreciate
since it gets them more involved. I'm sure I don't need to point out
that 'interactive' is one of the buzz popular appeal subjects of recent
years.


In itself, that seems fair enough. However it does concern me for two
reasons.

One is the reason I have already implied in previous postings. That it may
mean people experiment for long periods and never really know *why* one
arrangement 'sounds better' than others, or if a slight change might be
markedly 'better'. (I am putting 'better' in commas here to indicate that I
am keeping the definition vague beyond meaning 'preferred by the individual
involved'._

The other is that if the reasons for the preference were understood, it
might mean 'better' sound could be obtained more reliably, and with a much
lower cost and effort.

The obvious example for me is the effects of an amp having a frequency
response that is not flat, and an output impedance that interacts with the
load to further alter the response. If these factors produce what it
desired, and the user is aware of this, then similar 'tonal changes' could
be easily provided on a better basis with no need for the expense and
effort implied by having to experiment to develop your own valve amp, nor
the risks of instability or unsafety.

Alas, although valve amps and low feedback are 'in vogue', things like
'tone controls' are largely regarded as the spawn of the devil. This seems
a pity to me as - decently implimented and carefully applied - they can
often improve the sound (in my opinion/experience).

with your detailed construction notes which prove that substituting

componants has no effect on the sound.


How could a set of notes 'prove' this?


Exactly, I was being ironic. I thought my ironies were more transparent!


OK. :-) I must bear in mind the USA dictionary definition:

Irony = contains some iron. :-)

I'd be interested to know how you verify or test your own perceptions
in this area


Being 'lost in space' is part of the creative process


Yes. Can also be a PITA though... :-)

[snip]


For a production model clearly more verification and safety testing
would be required, but I'm strictly talking DIY here. The experienced
amateur builder would, however, not be happy with 'sounds good'. He/she
would want to know as much as possible WHY a componant change made a
difference, and further than that how it could be repeated in different
circumstances. One way to do this would be to build an infinite number
of prototypes and make careful notes. This is exactly what most
inventors did - e.g. the Wright brothers with their many prototype
'planes.


Yes, many inventors have proceeded that way. However although at times this
is unavoidable, if it continues it implies an 'unscientific' method and can
become very wasteful of time and effort. May also mean that better
solutions are missed due to simple lack of understanding.

However when they built a powered heaver that air flying machine they
didn't have much in the way of succesful previous examples to analyse. Nor
did they have the analytic methods we do nowdays. This situation is
somewhat different to what is available to anyone who wants to develop a
*commercial* amp these days. People have been making audio amps for yonks.
All kinds of designs. And the books and journals like JAES are filled with
reams of analysis and results. Seems a waste to ignore them. Although I
agree that at times there is no substitute for simply trying things out for
yourself with no preconceptions. Need a balance here...


At a later stage, hopefully, would come theory and equations
(as with aviation models) but the DIY builder may largely work by trial
and error. Not to be dismissed out of hand - it has its merits.


Agreed. Keep doing things that way myself. Seems a perfectly valid part of
the 'mix' when appropriate.

If I need a set of scope measurements and distortion tests for a circuit
I go down the road to my designer friend who designs commercial products
and has a proper bench setup. I have a scope but using it is still on
the 'to do' list of projects. So my verification is partly subjective
and partly intelligent trial and error and careful notes of results
achieved, voltages, componants, etc, tests which I do with a multimeter
and analyse in Excel, using equations derived from books like Morgan
Jones, Menno van der Veen etc and data on Duncanamps (valve data, power
supplies) and other audio sites. I also have a valve tester to test the
valves I use to see how they perform, so I at least know that.


Above seems fair enough in general terms to me. :-)

In my experience it is one thing to have an impression that a change
has had an effect. It is something else to test this over a period of
time in a way that can reliably rule out uncontrolled variables


This is true of so many things in life - I'm sure we could think of
numerous examples. I wouldn't even try to claim I'd eliminated all
uncontrolled variables, though one does try to use as much methodology
as one can.


My key worry here is the one of 'uncontrolled variables'. I know that
'unconscious bias' is also a worry, but since most of my own mind seems
'unconscious' I'm not on firm ground arguing about that. ;-

My problem is that I am aware of all kinds of factors which cause
variations in the sensitivity, etc, of my ears, variations in speaker
behaviour, variations in the acoustic properties of the air, slight head
movements, etc, etc. As a result I am very wary of simply 'using my ears'
unless it is in a carefully controlled and repeated way, and ideally with
some blind cross-checking with others. This is particularly the case when a
design might be commercial or for use by others. The problem here is not
'trusting my ears'. but of being able to be confident as to the reasons
*why* something did (or did not!) make me feel there was an audible change.

I have on many occasions not noticed changes which later became evident. Or
heard changes that later seemed to evaporate. Hence I am wary of factors
which affect this and which were not controlled and obvious at the time.

Slainte,

Jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html
  #180 (permalink)  
Old June 15th 04, 02:11 PM posted to uk.rec.audio
Andy Evans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 759
Default Anyone Got a Cheap Valve Power Amp or Integrated Amp For Sale?

Jim said: Given that you clearly have had the skill and patience and interest,
I feel
you would find the above a beneficial approach and you would be pleased to
have expanded your methods in the way I have outlined.

I couldn't agree more - I spend hours poring over Morgan Jones and other books
of theory, and making excel spreadsheets of results and equations. As I said in
another post - I have acquired a scope and a wavegen, just haven't had time to
set them up and learn how to use them. Maybe when I retire I'll have plenty of
time to build valve amps and a garage full of measuring equipment. That's a
little while away right now, though.

=== Andy Evans ===
Visit our Website:- http://www.artsandmedia.com
Audio, music and health pages and interesting links.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Audio Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.