In article , CT
wrote:
"Allan Bennett" wrote in message
...

Oh dear...

Not a fan of irony, then? Or just keen to show how jolly bombastic
you are?


It was *I* who was pointing out the irony to....

Shame when you have to point it out rather than just use it and sit back with
a smug grin.

Shame when people can't just accept it for what it is.

...oh, **** it - life's too short

Agreed!

Allan Bennett
Not a fan of shorts


--

"pseudoplatypus" wrote in message
...
mups wrote:
"pseudoplatypus" wrote:

I've had it happen a few times that I've had to be helped out to the
car. What I do nowadays is, when I start to feel it a bit, I go out
to the car and sit in, and have the waitress bring the drinks out to
me. Any time I need a refill, I just toot the horn.

Does the waitress always cum when you push your horn.

When I'm that drunk, pushing it is all I can manage.

Alcohol drinking scum!!!

Sir.Tony wrote:
"pseudoplatypus" wrote in message
...
mups wrote:
"pseudoplatypus" wrote:

I've had it happen a few times that I've had to be helped out to
the car. What I do nowadays is, when I start to feel it a bit, I
go out to the car and sit in, and have the waitress bring the
drinks out to me. Any time I need a refill, I just toot the horn.

Does the waitress always cum when you push your horn.

When I'm that drunk, pushing it is all I can manage.

Alcohol drinking scum!!!

Now, this is the thing. If I was drinking alcohol and not driving,
presumably you wouldn't have a problem? By the same token, if I was driving
without having drink taken, again no problem, yes? Similarly, if I was
driving after drinking, but not enough to put me over the current -
ridiculously low - limit, this would be okay?

But one little sniff over? Heh. Figures from the States reckon there's one
fatality for every 600,000 miles driven while over the limit. That gives me
a bit of leeway.

--
Platypus - (unreal)
VN800 Drifter, R80RT, Z200
DIAABTCOD#2 GPOTHUF#19
BOTAFOS#6 BOTAFOT#89 FTB#11
BOB#1 SBS#35 ANORAK#18 TWA#15

pseudoplatypus wrote:

Similarly, if I was
driving after drinking, but not enough to put me over the current -
ridiculously low - limit, this would be okay?

It could be argued the limit is ridiculously high. The '92 T&WA limit is
the same as the road.

The BR Board adopted the medical zero (30mg) for their safety critical
staff.

Without becoming a drink drive bore, you either drink, or you drive. You
don't do both. I speak as a train driver and the embarrasing uncle at
/whatever/ wedding.

Personally I don't give a toss.

Just hope all understand an 'average' pint of beer takes 2.5 hours to be
assimilated, (the usual specs say 1 hour per unit for 1/2 pint of 3%
Heineken). So the sensible *8* pint night on Guiness/Stella/Directors
you won't be fit to /drive/ until 17:00 the following day.

--
Simon

Brighton | MYSOB: http://www.sweller.co.uk/sob/
England | MZSOB: http://www.mztech.fsnet.co.uk/

sweller says...
pseudoplatypus wrote:

Similarly, if I was
driving after drinking, but not enough to put me over the current -
ridiculously low - limit, this would be okay?

It could be argued the limit is ridiculously high. The '92 T&WA limit is
the same as the road.

The BR Board adopted the medical zero (30mg) for their safety critical
staff.

Without becoming a drink drive bore, you either drink, or you drive. You
don't do both. I speak as a train driver and the embarrasing uncle at
/whatever/ wedding.

Personally I don't give a toss.

Just hope all understand an 'average' pint of beer takes 2.5 hours to be
assimilated, (the usual specs say 1 hour per unit for 1/2 pint of 3%
Heineken). So the sensible *8* pint night on Guiness/Stella/Directors
you won't be fit to /drive/ until 17:00 the following day.


But there are variables within the strength of the drinks mentioned
above; Guinness is 4.1, Directors is 4.8 and Stella is 5.2. Oh, and
apparently Heineken (with the ABV of 3.4%) has been replaced with the 5%
ABV as sold abroad.

I'm struggling to think of a lager that would be sold per pint with an
average ABV of 3% nowadays, even the Carling is 4.1%.

--
Lesley
ZXR400SP
SBS#11[with oak-leaf cluster]
BOTAFOT#101A UKRMHRC#12
BONY#54P BOB#18

Un-cork me to reply

sweller wrote:

snip

Without becoming a drink drive bore, you either drink, or you drive. You
don't do both.

AO****ingL

snip

--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l (Really) Sprint 1.7
Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk

On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 06:50:58 GMT, Catman
wrote:

sweller wrote:

snip

Without becoming a drink drive bore, you either drink, or you drive. You
don't do both.

AO****ingL

snip

****ing drink drive nazis.

FWIW I never ride while drinking, as it tends to spill all over the
place. And I certainly never ride while actually drunk, except when a)
it's not my bike, or b) I feel like it.

HTH

--
Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
GSX-R1000K3, CB400F2
BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, UKRMSPC#1, DFV#8, BOTCdV#1

Catman wrote:
sweller wrote:

snip

Without becoming a drink drive bore, you either drink, or you drive.
You don't do both.

AO****ingL

snip

Yeah, yeah, but where's sir.tony gone? I want to regale him with further
hair-raising tales of inebriated automobilism.

--
Platypus - (unreal)
VN800 Drifter, R80RT, Z200
DIAABTCOD#2 GPOTHUF#19
BOTAFOS#6 BOTAFOT#89 FTB#11
BOB#1 SBS#35 ANORAK#18 TWA#15

"Catman" wrote in message
...
sweller wrote:

snip

Without becoming a drink drive bore, you either drink, or you drive.
You
don't do both.

AO****ingL

snip

We should bring back random breath testing. I thing it should be standard
procedure give a driver a breath test when being stopped by the police, for
any reason.

"Catman" wrote in message
...
sweller wrote:

snip

Without becoming a drink drive bore, you either drink, or you drive.
You
don't do both.

AO****ingL

We should bring back random breath testing. I thing it should be standard
procedure give a driver a breath test when being stopped by the police, for
any reason.