Audio Banter

Audio Banter (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   uk.rec.audio (General Audio and Hi-Fi) (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/)
-   -   Hifi pre-history (https://www.audiobanter.co.uk/uk-rec-audio-general-audio/8982-hifi-pre-history.html)

Jim Lesurf[_2_] May 12th 16 11:58 AM

Hifi pre-history
 
Just to let people know I've added some examples to the 'valve era' page at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong.../ValveEra.html

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html


Brian Gaff May 12th 16 02:36 PM

Hifi pre-history
 
As a matter of interest. I'm running an old Rogers Cadet at the moment and
it really does make the grille in the top hot. How did valve stuff ever pass
health and safety back in the old days I wonder?
Brian

--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message
...
Just to let people know I've added some examples to the 'valve era' page
at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong.../ValveEra.html

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics
http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html




Don Pearce[_3_] May 12th 16 02:37 PM

Hifi pre-history
 
On Thu, 12 May 2016 12:58:01 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote:

Just to let people know I've added some examples to the 'valve era' page at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong.../ValveEra.html

Jim


Just had a quick skim. Did I read that right? You have to buy and fit
your own output transformer. If that is really so, I can see why there
is no overall NFB.

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Jim Lesurf[_2_] May 12th 16 03:56 PM

Hifi pre-history
 
In article , Don Pearce
wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2016 12:58:01 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote:


Just to let people know I've added some examples to the 'valve era'
page at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong.../ValveEra.html

Jim


Just had a quick skim. Did I read that right? You have to buy and fit
your own output transformer. If that is really so, I can see why there
is no overall NFB.


Yes. A different age. You *could* choose to buy it with a speaker and
transformer from Armstrong, as some ads showed. But these were an 'optional
extra'. The chassis wasn't for someone who just wanted to buy and use a
mass produced radio/radiogram.

The approach at the time was that keen 'enthusiasts' put together their own
kit. Bear in mind that well within living memory at the time you could have
bought radios where each *valve* came in its own nicely made wooden
cabinet. These were essentially the 'high end separates' / DIY of their
day.

This was the background that lead the company into making hifi rather than
consumer radios and TVs.

FWIW I'm currently collating adverts for the period from 1932 to about 1946
to illustrate just how different to now it was back then. Different world
that people have forgotten about.

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html


Don Pearce[_3_] May 12th 16 05:50 PM

Hifi pre-history
 
On Thu, 12 May 2016 16:56:08 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote:

In article , Don Pearce
wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2016 12:58:01 +0100, Jim Lesurf
wrote:


Just to let people know I've added some examples to the 'valve era'
page at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong.../ValveEra.html

Jim


Just had a quick skim. Did I read that right? You have to buy and fit
your own output transformer. If that is really so, I can see why there
is no overall NFB.


Yes. A different age. You *could* choose to buy it with a speaker and
transformer from Armstrong, as some ads showed. But these were an 'optional
extra'. The chassis wasn't for someone who just wanted to buy and use a
mass produced radio/radiogram.

The approach at the time was that keen 'enthusiasts' put together their own
kit. Bear in mind that well within living memory at the time you could have
bought radios where each *valve* came in its own nicely made wooden
cabinet. These were essentially the 'high end separates' / DIY of their
day.

This was the background that lead the company into making hifi rather than
consumer radios and TVs.

FWIW I'm currently collating adverts for the period from 1932 to about 1946
to illustrate just how different to now it was back then. Different world
that people have forgotten about.

Jim


My first ever amplifier was a single ended DIY kit from Radio and TV
Components (Acton) Ltd. The input valve was a double triode (ECC83, I
think) and the PA was a 6V6 GT. The feeling of triumph when it worked
was quite something.

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Dave Plowman (News) May 12th 16 11:57 PM

Hifi pre-history
 
In article ,
Don Pearce wrote:
My first ever amplifier was a single ended DIY kit from Radio and TV
Components (Acton) Ltd. The input valve was a double triode (ECC83, I
think) and the PA was a 6V6 GT. The feeling of triumph when it worked
was quite something.


The first amp everyone built here was the Mullard 3-3. Unless you were
very rich - then the 5-10.

--
*My wife has a slight impediment in her speech. She stops to breathe.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Don Pearce[_3_] May 13th 16 06:19 AM

Hifi pre-history
 
On Fri, 13 May 2016 00:57:53 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
Don Pearce wrote:
My first ever amplifier was a single ended DIY kit from Radio and TV
Components (Acton) Ltd. The input valve was a double triode (ECC83, I
think) and the PA was a 6V6 GT. The feeling of triumph when it worked
was quite something.


The first amp everyone built here was the Mullard 3-3. Unless you were
very rich - then the 5-10.


Pocket money definitely didn't stretch that far.

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Phil Allison[_3_] May 13th 16 06:20 AM

Hifi pre-history
 
Don Pearce wrote:

Jim Lesurf

Just to let people know I've added some examples to the 'valve era' page at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong.../ValveEra.html

Jim


Just had a quick skim. Did I read that right? You have to buy and fit
your own output transformer. If that is really so, I can see why there
is no overall NFB.



** The EXP48 output stage uses a pair of 6F6 pentodes operating essentially in class A, so has low distortion without NFB.

However the output impedance is high, providing current drive to the speaker.
The gain of such a stage follows the speaker's impedance, rising strongly at bass resonance and also at frequencies above 1kHz due to voice coil inductance.

With typical speakers of the time, mounted on an open baffle, this gave the resulting sound an automatic eq that was quite intentional.

Note the lack of any form of tone control.



..... Phil

Don Pearce[_3_] May 13th 16 06:48 AM

Hifi pre-history
 
On Thu, 12 May 2016 23:20:07 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
wrote:

Don Pearce wrote:

Jim Lesurf

Just to let people know I've added some examples to the 'valve era' page at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong.../ValveEra.html

Jim


Just had a quick skim. Did I read that right? You have to buy and fit
your own output transformer. If that is really so, I can see why there
is no overall NFB.



** The EXP48 output stage uses a pair of 6F6 pentodes operating essentially in class A, so has low distortion without NFB.

However the output impedance is high, providing current drive to the speaker.
The gain of such a stage follows the speaker's impedance, rising strongly at bass resonance and also at frequencies above 1kHz due to voice coil inductance.

With typical speakers of the time, mounted on an open baffle, this gave the resulting sound an automatic eq that was quite intentional.

Note the lack of any form of tone control.


Intentional or happy accident. I remember that sound - mellow was what
we would have called it.

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Woody[_4_] May 13th 16 07:19 AM

Hifi pre-history
 

"Phil Allison" wrote in message
...
Don Pearce wrote:

Jim Lesurf

Just to let people know I've added some examples to the 'valve
era' page at

http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong.../ValveEra.html

Jim


Just had a quick skim. Did I read that right? You have to buy and
fit
your own output transformer. If that is really so, I can see why
there
is no overall NFB.



** The EXP48 output stage uses a pair of 6F6 pentodes operating
essentially in class A, so has low distortion without NFB.

However the output impedance is high, providing current drive to the
speaker.
The gain of such a stage follows the speaker's impedance, rising
strongly at bass resonance and also at frequencies above 1kHz due
to voice coil inductance.

With typical speakers of the time, mounted on an open baffle, this
gave the resulting sound an automatic eq that was quite intentional.

Note the lack of any form of tone control.



I remember that from the 60's. In the Music Room the teacher used to
play us records with an old E.A.R. record player with valve amp
feeding what I guess was maybe a 8inch or 10 inch loudspeaker mounted
in the centre of a (quite solid) baffle board about 4ft or so square.
I can still hear it in my minds eye (as it were) to this day - and it
makes me smile.


--
Woody

harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright ©2004-2006 AudioBanter.co.uk