In article ,
tony sayer wrote:
A sky box or Freeview receiver is a much better platform for digital
reception.
But will almost certainly require an outside aerial or dish. Not always
convenient.
DAB I'm afraid has lost all credibility other than a AM
quality radio medium,
You must have a good memory if you remember AM of the same quality as DAB.
with the exception of radio 3 but that is being
eroded from time to time.
R4 is fine too.
If you really want to hear good high quality radio then get a half
decent digital satellite receiver without an outboard DAC and tune into
Bayern 4 klassik the audio on there is simply stunning, some of the best
you'll hear especially when they transmit a live broadcast.
Wonder why a live broadcast should be any different?
Radio and audio quality just as it should be.
It depends on the remit. To provide full 'bandwidth' DAB would restrict
the number of stations. Which to many would make it pointless, since it's
purpose is to provide trouble free reception - or better than FM or AM in
this respect.
Pity the powers that be at the BBC can't do it the same way
Not actually just down to the BBC. They don't control frequency allocation.
Just about every radio station is heavily processed before transmission by
any medium. As are the majority of pop CDs. It would seem it's what the
public wants. There obviously isn't the market to cater for those who want
natural sound.
You might be surprised how many even - you'd think - clued up
enthusiasts complain about altering levels between different stations on
both radio and TV. The answer to this long term 'problem' is to squeeze
*everything* up to maximum level. If this suits the great unwashed, why
worry about data rate on DAB?
--
*A journey of a thousand sites begins with a single click *
Dave Plowman
London SW 12
RIP Acorn