"Chris Isbell" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:08:17 -0000, "Gary B"
wrote:

So - I assume its because it produces copies that sound much better than
what I produce using my £40 cd burner at present? - or am I missing
something? Advice appreciated

It's digital! Unless there is a fault or incompatibility all copies
will be identical to the original regardless of the price of the
duplicating equipment.


--
Chris Isbell
Southampton
UK

They're not, funnily enough. Well, they may well be identical but they sound
different. I have a NAD 660 and the copies often vary in length (only a
couple of seconds), and every so often there's a glitch between continuous
tracks (such as live albums, DSOM etc) when using the direct dub. According
to the many reviews I read before buying, the NAD is pretty good. This is
the reason given to me by the NAD people:
----------
Sorry there is no cure for the problem, and it is normal on the C660 as with
many other makes and models I am told.

The Bit copy is making a perfect duplicate - it is the track information
that is causing the "Glitch" to appear in the copy.

--------------