
October 29th 04, 01:58 PM
posted to uk.rec.audio
|
|
The main reason valves & vinyl is better...
"mick" wrote in message
news 
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:53:41 +0100, Nick Gorham wrote:
I think valves and vinyl are better than CD and SS, thats just my
thought,
doesn't mean anything much, certainly doesn't mean anyone else is wrong,
and doesn't mean my "better" is better (or even the same) than someone
else "better". So I think that objecting to the use of the term better
doesn't work anymore than saying its ok to have a preference.
Can't we just agree to differ, I know, silly idea....
Nicely said, Nick.
Agreed.
I like valves cos they light up - and, for me, its more fun to build valve
amps than s/s. Sitting here, I have a NAD 3020, a pair of Crimson 530
monoblocks, a Quad 33/303 system and a home-built SE triode-connected 6L6
"power" amp (must be almost 2 watts out of its cheap "music-centre"
OPTs...) and at the moment I prefer the latter! My musical appreciation is
probably distorted by the fact that I built it. ;-)
*Never*.....!!?? ;-)
Sometimes I prefer CD as the source - its more convenient -
and sometimes I prefer vinyl for the sound (my vinyl source is better than
my CD player). There is definitely room for both.
Agreed.
Personally, I don't mind whether my amp has a flat response etc so long as
it sounds ok to me... :-)
Agreed.
|