0 means nothing, ie it doesn't exist
1 means something, ie it does exist.

It appears that you are the one who does not understand what you
wrote, which was a mathematical expression, not a philosophical one.

In the context of this argument I understood what Kurt wrote and I also
would agree.

So the difference between something existing and not existing is far
greater than increasing the number of existing things.

I don't agree.


Hmm you'd be happy all alone on the whole wide world?
If you had something when previously you had nowt would this not be better
than having many?

Example1:

You have to walk 10 miles to work.. no other means available.. therefore 10
miles back.

Oneday you awake and a Audi TT is sitting in your drive with a full tank of
fuel :-)

WOW you jump in and enjoy your journey to work AND back.

Example2:

You drive to work everyday in your Audi TT... nothing much thought of it as
it sits in your drive every morning.

Oneday you awake and the front of the house is littered with Audi TT's,
however overwhelmed you may feel at having so many cars you can still only
drive 1 at a time.

So therefore is not better to have 1 than many if you had nowt before?

Steve